UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: ESCALATION OF POLITICAL PERSECUTION AGAINST CITIZENS OF THE NIGER DELTA REGION OF NIGERIA
United Nations/State party , leaders, media, civil rights, politicians, lawmakers are invited to the United States to see how loots from Nigeria are used to disuade birth of good government in Nigeria 1914-present. Dr. Phillip Chukwuma Ofume is the ONLY presidential candidate through this long period that is able to research and emerge with political program that will give birth to exemplary and desirable federal system of government in Nigeria.
LINK TO DR. PHILLIP CHUKWUMA OFUME'S POLITICAL MANIFESTO: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=ofume+v.+george+w.+bush+et
+al&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&aqi=&
aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=CXAvgaLIjTKD0KYXy
zAT16YHLCgAAAKoEBU_QmQ4K
______________________________________________
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS COURT SYSTEM
TRIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETS
DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
LYNN DIVISION ______________________________________________
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETS )
Complainant )
)
V. )
)
MAUREEN OFUME ) Case Docket No. 0913CR004396
Defendant )
)
V. )
)
PH ILLIP OFUME )
Movant – Intervenor )
______________________________________________________________________
INTERVENOR'S MOTION TO INTERVENE ON BEHALF PARTIES, COMPLAINANT, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS AND DEFENDANT, MAUREEN OFUME
PURSUANT TO FED. R. C. PR 24
_________________________________________________________________________
1
C/Wealth v. Maureen Ofume Case Docket No. 0913CR004396
TAKE NOTICE that Movant – Intervenor aforementioned, per his Motion and the enclosed Sworn Affidavit, respectfully request leave of this honourable Court to intervene on behalf all the parties, Complainant and Defendant in the above titled action. Movant - Intervenor claims secured interests in all the parties for the sake of justice (including natural justice) , human rights, rule of law and public interest.
That in recognizing the importance of Police officer in the capacity to protect civil society, record shows inside and outside the United States that some Police Officers have mixed their duties with political interest because of the ambition to dig gold. Also under the efforts to protect civil society, Police Officers have diligently prosecuted and convicted some people that are working against the state and its citizens.
Contrary, in Complainant’s or Lynn Police Department’s multiple plan to disrupt my bid for the President of Nigeria 2007 and 2011, Defendant, Maureen Ofume and her son Kleber Ofume (hereinafter “my two major campaign workers”) at the instance of the Complainant or Lynn Police Department were arrested, detained, charged before this Court. Before Kleber’s arraignment in this Court, Lynn Police Department or Complainant reported Kleber to the media and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement –ICE. Reliant on this passage of information, thus before Kleber’s trial, in this Court and without respecting the Due Process Rights of Kleber or right to appear before an Immigration Judge and processing him through the host country's (Nigeria ) diplomatic mission in the United States, Kleber was deported to Nigeria on March 10, 2009 (see attached Movant-Intervenor’s Affidavit and Exhibits). March 10, 2009 at 1.00 pm was also Kleber’s bail hearing. On August 19, 2009 Defendant, Maureen Ofume who is another backbone sustaining my presidential campaign was captured by Lynn Police Department and charged and her trial is scheduled for July 8, 2010.
In further support of this Motion, Movant – Intervenor submits his (Phillip Ofume's) Sworn Affidavit, Exhibits, index of law and other material references.
Respectfully submitted,
___________________
Phillip C. Ofume, Ph.D.
Movant - Intervenor
25 Trade Street, Suite 201
Fredericksburg, VA 22406
Tel. (804) 302-3089
E-mail: globalaids_hivcureinteraction@yahoo.co.uk
2
C/Wealth v. Maureen Ofume Case Docket No. 0913CR004396
copies to :
President Barack H. Obama President of the United States of America, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20500; Vice- President Joseph Biden, Washington Office: Eisenhower Executive Office Bldg. Washington, DC 20501; Honourable Eric H. Holder, Jr. US Secretary of Justice and Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Office of the Assistant Attorney General, Main Washington, D.C. 205 30; Hon. Sec. of Justice and Attorney-General of Massachusetts; Essex District Attorney Jonathan W. Blodgett ; United Nations High Commission for Human Rights United Nations High Commission for Refugees, Geneva, Switzerland.
______________________________________________
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS COURT SYSTEM
TRIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETS
DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
LYNN DIVISION
______________________________________________________
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETS )
Complainant )
)
V. )
)
MAUREEN OFUME ) Case Docket No. 0913CR004396
Defendant )
)
V. )
)
PH ILLIP OFUME )
Movant – Intervenor ) __________________________________________________________________________________
AFFIDAVIT & MEMORANDUM OF THE MOVANT-INTERVENOR, PHILLIP OFUME IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE ON BEHALF PARTIES, COMPLAINANT, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS AND DEFENDANT, MAUREEN OFUME PURSUANT TO FED. RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 24
_____________________________________________________________________
1
C/Wealth v. Maureen Ofume Case Docket No. 0913CR004396
I, Movant-Intervenor Phillip Ofume, residing at 25 Trade Street Suite 201 Fredericksburg Virginia 22406, USA certify under penalty of perjury under U.S. Law that:
A. OPEN STATEMENT OF THE MOVANT - INTERVENOR
A.1. In recognizing the importance of the duty and peacemaking role of Police Officer in all society thus in part in effort to protect civil society, record shows inside and outside the United States that some Police Officers have claimed and mixed their duties with political interests because of the ambition to dig gold outside official duties and the protected has been nailed to crime which it commits as result of the good work of Police Officer.
A.2. En dehor or outside paragraph A.1. above, requires that all recognizable activities and duties of police officer within the framework of the operating law are lawful and other recognizable activities and duties of police officer outside the framework of the operating law are unlawful and victims must go to Court of record to seek redress or justice.
A.3. Based on subpara A.1. and A.2. above as a Movant - Intervenor in above mentioned case, I claim secured interests in all the parties for the sake of justice (including natural justice) , human rights, rule of law and public interest.
A. 4. I know and read about parties in this case particularly, the Defendant, Maureen Ofume and the Complainant, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Several cases caused as Ofume family v. Agencies of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and previous Government of America are directed to oppress and mistreat defendant, Maureen Ofume and her entire family (schools, department of social services, utility companies, immigration court, and other regional, state and federal governments and their agencies). For example, Government of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and its agencies have persecutorily created over twenty five (25) lawsuits because the smallest request for regional, state and federal services in part must involve police or in major part must go to court and pass through abnormal channel and court and police undermine the rule of law. Two of these cases have reached The Supreme Court of the United States and United Nations. Recently effective, September 29, 2005 to the date of swearing this Affidavit, I have closely watched and reviewed the relationship between Defendant and her family and Complainant. and its agencies.
2
C/Wealth v. Maureen Ofume Case Docket No. 0913CR004396
B. COLLABORATION BETWEEN LYNN POLICE DEPARTMENT AND U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT (ICE), JUDGES, ETC: REASON FOR ARRESTING, DETAINING, CHARGING, EX-COMMUNICATING AND DEPORTING KLEBER ODIMEGWU OFUME (hereinafter, "son of the Defendant, Maureen Ofume") TO NIGERIA AND ARRESTING, DETAINING AND CHARGING DEFENDANT, MAUREEN OFUME(hereinafter, "mother of Kleber Odimegwu Ofume")
B.1. In the United States of America, I am refugee, asylee, stateless person, prisoner of conscience and potential presidential candidate In-Exile bided and bidding for the President of Nigeria 2007 and 2011. Recognizing that Nigeria and PARTICULARLY my region of origin (NIGER DELTA REGION) have been impoverished. Recognizing that 1935 - present, certain Nigerian leaders, politicians, lawmakers, oil/gas companies and their allies have looted over US$1trillion and that this money is used to organize political persecution, police/military repression and brutality, murder/assassination, installing hereditary stooge leaders/governments, etc. Reason that I have the moral and other skils to stop these loots and impoverishment. Several direct and indirect steps have been taken to stop me. see my campaign directly or via Ofume v. George W. Bush et al (The Supreme Court of the United States - No. 08- 8873 http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=ofume+v.+george+w.+bush+et+al+ &btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=C-_uwltYXTMSSEoHDtgeVgPXGCgAAAKoEBU_QQsF3 ).
B.1.b. In my campaign 2007 and 2011 I have two major campaign workers and supporters (defendant, Maureen Ofume and her son Kleber Ofume) and internally, they are known to be my major direct and indirect pillars and foundations. Moneyed strategy to completely impede and destroy my campaign 2011 is put in place under huge collaboration internationally by the concerned cartel to remove or kill Maureen Ofume and Kleber Ofume.
B.1.c. Same as campaign 2007, as campaign 2011 heat up and rapidly closing in, to lock them (Maureen Ofume and Kleber Ofume) and destroy my campaign the following action has been paid for and swiftly taken and on-going as follows:
B1.c.i. On October 16, 2007 before Immigration Judge Matthew D'Angelo, Government of America lost the charge [212(a)(7) (A)(i)(I)] brought against the Defendant (Maureen Ofume), Kleber Ofume and the entire nuclear family (including Movant -Intervenor). In place of granting relief sought by the Defendant (Maureen Ofume), Kleber Ofume and the entire nuclear family (including Movant -Intervenor), Judge Matthew D'Angelo
3
C/Wealth v. Maureen Ofume Case Docket No. 0913CR004396
manufactured uncharged or non-criminal case which is EXPIRED BIOMETRIC TEST which remain expired at the instance of Judge Matthew D'Angelo, Clerk/Administrator of the US Immigration Court, Boston, MA., USCIS Nebraska Service Center, etc. On October 16, 2007 Judge Matthew D'Angelo ignored my Motion for Deportation Designation (Venezuela, Russia and Iran), which I filed with his (Judge D'Angelo) Court and swiftly moved to issue scattered deportation against me, Defendant (Maureem Ofume) and her entire family as follows:
B.1.c.i.a Her three children born in Canada to be deported Canada
B.1.c.i.b. Her three children (Kleber Ofume and two others) born in Nigeria be deported to Nigeria.
B. 1.c.i.c. Her one child born in the United States be removed and put in custody of the Department of Social Services.
B.1.c.i.d. Defendant (Maureen Ofume) and Movant -Intervenor (Phillip Ofume) be deported to Nigeria because their country of origin is Nigeria SEE http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=Judge+ Matthew+ D%27Angelo+and+ofume+family&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql= &oq=&gs_rfai=CO8fP3F0aTL6fCouugATnu7y-CgAAAKoEBU_Q2mXc
B.1.d. To implement Judge D'Angelo's Order listed above, paid assignments were issued to US Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE), Lynn Police Department, Immigration and other law courts, etc.
B.1. e. On December 23, 2008 some agents were mounted at the 7-Eleven Stores whereat Kleber Ofume works as night manager. Kleber Ofume At about 1.00 a.m. one (male) of the mounted agents started something like organized trouble in nature of harassing Kleber's female customers and Kleber pleaded that he should not harass his customers. This soft and simple plea, energized this agent and he telephoned Lynn Police Department. Lynn Police Officers came and disrupted Kleber's work and arrested, removed and detained him and same night (12/23/2008) without investigation Kleber was charged by Lynn Police Department. Swiftly Lynn Police Department distributed the news and information to ICE, media and the news appeared in morning newpapers. Also see http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=KLEBER%27S+DEPORTATION&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=CYUdEeVkaT JS3OofAzQS3rZWfAwAAAKoEBU_Q4FkR; http://www.google.com/search?q=RISK+ OF+DETAINING+KLEBER+OFUME:+SUFFOLK+COUNTY+HOUSE+OF+CORRECTION+%26+LYNN+POLICE+DEPARTMENT+%26&hl=en&filter=0
4
C/Wealth v. Maureen Ofume Case Docket No. 0913CR004396
B.1.f. On October 12, 2005 ICE issued 1-94 to Kleber Ofume and other members of my family and ICE deliberately entered several errors which created several impediment as to access to right to service and other problems. Instantly, on October 12, 2005 I requested ICE to effect correction but ICE threatened to re-arrest, detain and deport me. Thereafter after our (Ofume family's) release, I continued to request ICE to effect correction without action take in all the plea circumstances. Kleber is a student at the NORTH SHORE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, LYNN, MA with the educational force to earn his Associate Degree sometimes year 2010 and without criminal record inside and outside the United States. References of Kleber Ofume are hereto attached and marked EXHIBITS "H", "I", "J", "K"
B.1. g. On January 7, 2009 I sent Kleber to ICE at Boston Logan Airport. Upon presenting his request, ICE officials there used the lead provided to it by Lynn Police Department and arrested, detained and ex-communicated Kleber to the extent that parents, friends, relations, siblings, NGOs, etc were sanctioned from telephoning and visiting him at SUFFOLK COUNTY HOUSE OF CORRECTION. The charge brought against Kleber by Lynn Police Department remained and Kleber was not arraigned, tried and convicted, before he (Kleber) was forcibly deported to Nigeria (also see below).
B.1.h. I provided Kleber with defence counsel, Attorney Nancy Norman (Lynn, MA) and she took full payment from me and went underground and conspired with Judge Matthew D'Agenlo. Attorney Norman failed to file preliminary Motion which will be Motion for Stay of Deportation. Three days to the deportation of Kleber, Attorney Norman emerged from her hiding place and joined Judge D'Angelo to set down Bail Motion returnable for March 10, 2009 at 1.00 pm appearing before Judge D'Angelo. On March 10, 2009 Kleber Ofume was deported to Nigeria. See http://www.google.com/ search?hl=en&source=hp&q=ofume+v+attorney+nancy+norman&btnG=Google+Search&aq=o&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=CMSHW2HEaTMG6PIXUM8vi_dAKAAAAqgQFT9BDiRE
B.1.i. All these incidents in Massachusetts and US Court angered the new government under President Barack Obama and Vice-President Joseph Biden. After the deportation of Kleber Ofume I filed new Motion for Stay of Deportation before The US Court of Appeal for the First Circuit and Hon. Secretary of Justice and Attorney-General of the United States, Eric H. Holder filed Non-opposition Motion. The US Court of Appeal for the First Circuit granted my Motion. There was a review on the entire case and Hon. Secretary of Justice and Attorney-General of the United States, Eric H. Holder filed Motion to Remand our case back to the US BIA. The Motion was heard by the US Court of Appeal for the First Circuit and after all submissions, the Government's Motion was granted per the Judgment of the US Court of Appeal for the First Circuit dated April 22, 2010.
5
C/Wealth v. Maureen Ofume Case Docket No. 0913CR004396
B.1.j. Grant of Stay of my Motion and change of government may have angered Lynn Police Department, ICE, etc. To continue the disruption action on my presidential campaign, on August 19, 2009 Lynn Police Department arrested, detained and charged the Defendant , Maureen Ofume to completely disrupt my presidential campaign. (see further readings below and also see http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp& q=lynn+police+and+the+ofume+family& btnG=Google+Search&aq=o&aqi=&aql= &oq=&gs_rfai=CjQVWLGsaTJX7M5-yMZX6pcIKAAAAqgQFT9Bq7l0
B.1.k. On March 17, 2008 the Tenants that have been harassing defendant, Maureen Ofume and my entire family, Salvatore Vigorito and Verizon, Inc. entered the basement of 33 Arlington Street Lynn, MA 01902 and disposed poisonous chemical and after the disposal several members of my family collapsed and were hospitalized. Lynn Police Department was called including extra-911 call. Only fire department answered our call. Lynn Police Department did not come. I went to file complaint with Lynn Police Department against Salvatore Vigorito and Verizon, Inc. No arrest, investigation and charge was brought against Salvatore Vigorito and Verizon, Inc. After this disappointment, I went to The Northeast Housing Court, Lawrence, MA to filed Criminal Complaint. The Clerk/Magistrate of the Northeast Housing Court, Lawrence, MA refused to issue subpoena on several Physicians or doctors that were assigned to me and my family and other witnesses purpose of setting path running to discharge the defendants. See http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=BIOTERRORISM+IN+ LYNN&start=10&sa=N ; http://groups.google.co.tz/group/google.public.support. general/msg/716b 1080da4b3c57
B.1.L. On September 29, 2005 we succeeded in escaping into the US en route Washington, D.C. but we were forced to land at Boston logan airport and forced to apply for asylum there. Our persecutors took over several agencies and stakeholder inside and outside Massachusetts and further escalated mistreatment against the Defendant and the entire family. ICE impounded, seized and hold permanent possession of our (Ofume family's) United Nations Refugees Travel documents and passports, torture/persecution photographs and medical records, birth certificates, etc. Reason for these extensive seizure is to bring charge of landing in the US without unexpired documents.
B.1.m. Regarding what happened between September 29, 2005 and January 27, 2006 see the Matter, Ofume v. George W. Bush et al (The Supreme Court of the United States - No. 08- 8873.http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source= hp&q=ofume+v. +george+w.+bush+et+al+ &btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=C-_uwltYXTMSSEoHDtgeVgPXGCgAAAKoEBU_QQsF3 )
B.1.n. On January 27, 2006 the terrible uninhabitable apartment (8 Hall Avenue, 2nd Floor Braintree, MA) which we were forced to live and which generated the lawsuit stated above was set ablaze and we escaped the blaze. Upmost and down floors were housed with trained tugs and
6
C/Wealth v. Maureen Ofume Case Docket No. 0913CR004396
harassment to stage 24 hour/day and everyday harassment. Braintree Police (day/night) ignored calls against these political tugs. As harassment plan, several people living upmost and down floors frequently create allegations and call Braintree Police Department and swiftly the Police answer them and come banging our door to issue threat of arrest, deportation and imprisonment.
B.1.n. On February 3, 2006 at about 4.00 p.m. we were forced to live in another terrible uninhabitable apartment (33 Arlington Street Apartment #1, Lynn, MA 01902) which is subject of this action. Less than two (2) hours following occupation of this apartment, police officer of the Lynn Police Department came with a man who told me that he works with the Department of Social Services (DSS, Lynn, MA). DSS staff accused the Defendant, Maureen Ofume and I for failing, neglecting and refusing to register our children in Lynn Public School. Few days latter, DSS convicted me without investigation and hearing for failing to register my children in school within less than two (2) hours when we were placed at 33 Arlington Street Apartment #1, Lynn, MA 01902. Because it is not possible to register any child in a new school jurisdiction and system within less two hours upon residing in this school system, I decided to file appeal and subsequent Complaint against the DSS. (See Massachusetts Superior Court Department, Lawrence Division; Massachusetts Court of Appeals and Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court CIVIL APPEAL ACTION: NO. 07-1207A http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q =Phillip+Ofume+v. +Mass+Department+of+social+Services&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&aqi= &aql=&oq=&gs _rfai=CGIiszd0XTIe0I4K_tge8lqCwCgAAAKoEBU_QSyuo . To stop all the litigations over 25 different lawsuits in Massachusetts and preparation to sue Lynn Police Department and several officers and weaken my presidential campaign, on August 19, 2009 defendant and her entire family were rendered homeless and forced to relocate to Virginia and unable to pursue some of these cases.
B.1.o. Reference to paragraph B.1.n. above, same harassment plan was put in place as 8 Hall Avenue 2nd Floor Braintree, MA and also 33 Arlington Street Apartment #1, Lynn, MA 01902 was jammed with horrifying 24 hours/day harassment tugs with several intentions to attack my family and I. Several ocasions I telephoned Lynn Police Department and the police officers on duty requested me to arrest and bring these tugs to their police station.
B.1.p. Sometimes, in 2008 I telephone Lynn Police Department to come immediately to stop two young men that told Kleber Ofume that they were armed and coming to his room to kill him. Swiftly I telephoned Lynn Police Department and pleaded for emergency response. Shortly Defendant Maureen Ofume and I saw the men arrive and parked their vehicle in front of our apartment building. Initially, they waited in their car and continued to issue threat on Kleber. Over 45 minutes from the initial call and the time they were ready to take action, Lynn Police Department did not intervene. When they came out of their car, Defendant and I used our expereince in dealing with similar situation to use friendliness to call their attention and pleaded for peace. They calm down and open up to talk. After we have succeeded in calming them down, Police arrived and allowed them go without searching and arresting them.
B.1.q. Worst part of the Lynn Police Department's involvement to destroy my political
7
C/Wealth v. Maureen Ofume Case Docket No. 0913CR004396
campaign via destroying my major campaign workers is that another organized setup against Kleber Ofume was put in place and carefully planned to link Kleber Ofume and the entire family by enemity with certain dangerous suspected armed people or groups. Sometimes in year 2008 Kleber told me that a young man ran into 7-Eleven Store where Kleber works as Night Manager. About 2.00 a.m. one youngman ran into 7-Eleven Store pretentiously claiming that some armed people were chasing him. He further claimed that the armed people were parked within the 7-Eleven Store premises and that Kleber should help him call Lynn Police Officers. Per duty of the citizens and residents of the United States, Kleber freely called Lynn Police and they arrived. Shocking to Kleber, the young man was standing inside Kleber's store but Lynn Police Officers started forcing Kleber to leave his work and go out with them (police officers and youngman ) into the dark to show them and identify the people. When Lynn Police Officers tried to use force on Kleber, he conceeded or agreed to accompany them and Kleber was forced into police patrol car. Thereafter or effective date of this incident, Lynn Police Department and Prosecution started some of the worst harassments against Kleber and Defendant's (Maureen Ofume) and her entire family because several times from week to week Lynn Police Department and Prosecution continued to come to our (Ofume family's) apartment to bang the door/window to serve notices to force Kleber to attend several witnesses court proceedings where these dangerous people will see and identify Kleber. I accompanied Kleber to attend some court hearings. After some appearances, Kleber told me that he is in danger and he would prefer to relocate to New York or other safe states. After Kleber's deportation Lynn Police Department and Prosecution continued to harass my family including serving notices on Kleber who they know has been deported or no longer in the United States.
C. QUESTIONABLE POLICE ACTION ON AUGUST 19, 2009
C. 1. I know and read about parties in this case particularly, the Defendant, Maureen Ofume and the Complainant, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Several cases Ofume family v. Agencies of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Government of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and its agencies have created over twenty five (25) lawsuits because the smallest request for regional, state and federal services must go to court and pass through abnormal channel. Two of these cases have reached The Supreme Court of the United States. Recently effective, September 29, 2005 to the date of swearing this Affidavit, I have closely watched and reviewed the relationship between Defendant and her family and Complainant. and its agencies.
8
C/Wealth v. Maureen Ofume Case Docket No. 0913CR004396
C.2. In my Motion herewith attached, I have sincerely requested leave of this honourable Court to intervene on behalf all the parties, Complainant and Defendant in the above titled action. As Movant - Intervenor I claim secured interests in all the parties for the sake of justice (including natural justice) , human rights, rule of law and public interest. To ease path to justice, three (3) questions in issue which maybe raised in this my affidavit is whether there has been any good relationship between defendant (Maureen Ofume) and her entire nuclear family and Lynn Police Department on first part; whether there was lawful eviction on August 19, 2009 at 33 Arlington Street Apartment #1, Lynn, MA 01902 on second part; and reference to the history of the relationship between Lynn Police Department and defendant and her family; whether the action of Lynn Police Department on August 19, 2009 is not politically motivated on third part. Answer and analysis to these questions are as follows:
C.3. On the apartment located at 33 Arlington Street Apartment #1, Lynn, MA 01902, on February 3, 2006 I signed lease agreement with the Metropolitan Boston Housing Partnership (MBHP) and the apartment was provided under low income shelter program which includes everything - rent, utilities, maintenance, etc. MBHP signed Lease Agreement with one, Salvatore Vigorito (hereinafter "one of the landlords of 33 Arlington Street Apartment #1, Lynn, MA 01902 and husband of Nancy Vigorito"). Lease Agreement between MBHP and I attached and marked EXHIBIT "A"
C.4. MBHP told me that Nancy Vigorito is angry that Salvatore Vigorito is misusing the rent paid to him without maintaining the apartment and as result of lack of maintenance The Massachusetts Department of Health and Human Service (Inspectorate Department) issued extensive citation in June 2008 and June 2009. Based on the poor condition of the apartment I sued DTA, MBHP and Vigoritos and claimed $50,000.00 against each of them in The Northeast Housing Court Lawrence, MA. Nancy Vigorito wants rent be paid to her directly.
C.5 Swiftly MBHP commenced forcible Massachusetts Administrative eviction and relocation proceedings against me (see Mass. G.L.c. 258, § § 1, 2, 3, and 4; 106 CMR 309.070(A); 106 CMR 309.040; G.L. c. 18, section 2; G.L. Chapter 30A and Chapter 16; 106 CMR 343, 367, ;106 CMR 309.040; G.L.c 30A & Chapter 18 s. 16; 106 CMR 343.245(A)(6); etc.) . As my Administrative Appeal (Phillip Ofume v. Salvatore Vigorito, DTA and MBHP) remain pending before the Superior Court, Lawrence (CIVIL ACTION NO. 07 CV.00178), Nancy Vigorito brought duplicated action against only me without DTA and MBHP at off-jurisdiction court or The Northeast Housing Court, Lawrence, MA Docket No. 08SP003967 because the Clerk/Magistrate of the Northeast Housing Court, Lawrence, MA has interest in my political campaign (see http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=ofume+v.+vigoritos+-+Northeast+Housing+Court&btnG=Google+Search&aq=o&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs _rfai=C1Jjak6AbTL2JOYLygwTmx-njDAAAAKoEBU_Q_B9f. I signed lease with
9
C/Wealth v. Maureen Ofume Case Docket No. 0913CR004396
MBHP and not with the Vigoritos (Nancy & Salvatore). Under Mass. G.L.c. 258, § § 1, 2, 3, and 4; 106 CMR 309.070(A); 106 CMR 309.040; G.L. c. 18, section 2; G.L. Chapter 30A and Chapter 16; 106 CMR 343, 367, ;106 CMR 309.040; G.L.c 30A & Chapter 18 s. 16; 106 CMR 343.245(A)(6); etc. ONLY Massachusetts Superior Court Department has the jurisdiction to take this case. The Northeast Housing Court, Lawrence, MA has no jurisdiction over this case on single disputed property Mass Administrative link or rules/regulations and General Law, landlord and tenant may proceed directly to Northeast Housing Court Department. If The Northeast Housing Court, Lawrence, MA wants to claim jurisdiction it must come by leave and if the leave is granted the pending case must be withdrawn or consolidated.
C.6. When the costs in these litigation continued to weigh down on Nancy Vigorito, DTA, MBHP, Salvatore Vigorito and others, information revealed secret settlement between MBHP, DTA and Vigoritos. Further information stated that full year rent (January 2009 through December 2009) was paid to Nancy Vigorito and Salvatore Vigorito under two extensive uninhabitation citations mentioned above. Evidence/Exhibits of this payment are hereto attached and marked EXHIBITS "B" and "C".
C.7. Based on the receipt of this heavy rent payment, on August 14, 2009 Nancy Vigorito filed Motion to Withdraw her Motion for Execution, Possession and Costs with The Northeast Housing Court, Lawrence returnable before Lynn Session. Nancy Vigorito's Motion was received and stamped by the Clerk/Magistrate of the Court and copies were sent to me by Nancy Vigorito. Nancy Vigorito's Motion was set down for hearing on August 18, 2009 at 9.00 a.m. Nancy Vigorito's Motions requesting Execution dated July 24, 2009 and handwritten Motion to Withdraw her Motion for Execution, Possession and Costs and the mailing envelope are herewith attached and marked EXHIBITS "D", "E" and "F".
C.8. On August 18, 2009 The Honourable Judge David Kerman heard Nancy Vigorito's Motion to Withdraw her Motion for Execution, Possession and Costs and it was granted and her pending case before this Court was closed. The Honourable Judge Kerman adjourned my claim against Nancy Vigorito, DTA, MBHP, and Salvatore Vigorito to October 6, 2009 at 9.00 a.m. "to review other claims filed by the defendant" (Judge Kerman), Phillip Ofume. (see The Honourable Judge Kerman's proceedings' tape on August 18, 2009).
C.9. After the hearing on August 18, 2009 I prepared dossier of Nancy Vigorito's Motion to Withdraw her Motion for Execution, Possession and Costs and the hearing on August 18, 2009 and served same upon the Chief of Lynn Police Department. Service
10
C/Wealth v. Maureen Ofume Case Docket No. 0913CR004396
was effected directly on the Office of the Chief of Lynn Police Department.
C. 10. Nancy/Salvatore Vigorito are a successful construction contractors. During the proceedings of Nancy Vigorito's Compalints, bribery and corruption were suspected because the Clerks and administrators of The Northeast Housing Court, Lawrence, MA Docket No. 08SP003967 and Massachusetts Court of Appeals tried to engage in several extra-judicial activities including duplicating case files and hiding my brief, motions, application, petitions, etc and issuing unsigned and unverified orders. Thereafter, I suspect that Judges in the Massachusetts Court of Appeals may have been angered by the conduct of the clerks and administrators and in addition to granting my Motion for Stay of Execution, Possession, etc against Nancy Vigorito, Judges issued strong warning and directions. Judges' warning and directions is hereto attached and marked EXHIBIT "L"
C.11. On August 19, 2009 I worked early morning in my office/room at 33 Arlington Street Apartment #1, Lynn, MA 01902 and thereafter I traveled to Boston, MA. I was surprised and shocked when the Defendant telephoned me that Lynn Police Department and others entered our apartment and removing and stealing our properties. Reason of the bad relationship (see below) between Defendant and her family and Lynn Police Department, I telephoned the Chief of Lynn Police Department to request him to make peace. I telephoned the Chief of Lynn Police Department because few weeks behind the day of the incident (08/19/2009) I issued notice of an intended litigation against his department and several police officers and upon receipt of my intended action notice , Chief of Lynn Police Department pleaded that I should direct further incident to him or his secretary as he continued to review scores of past incident.
C.12. I told the men that telephoned me in Boston that I informed the Chief of Lynn Police Department to send peace office to stop the tug-like people whom
my family and other people (who identified themselves as friends of my son, Kleber Ofume) that telephoned me told me were passing our properties through the back window to other people outside the window. Majority of my publications and other professional work equipments [(fax/telephone/copier, photocopy/printer, video and accessories, media tape recorders, three DVD players, table mobile telephone, four cell phones, cash ($1,250.00), several regional, state and federal courts and other documents, etc] were heartlessly looted and carted away. Looting and carting away our properties were easy for them because Police allowed them and per the termination of Nancy Vigorito's Complaint on August 18, 2009 my family and I were not expecting any eviction on August 19, 2009 because of the full year payment by the DTA and MBHP and Nancy Vigorito's Motion to withdraw her duplicated Complaint mentioned above was granted on August 18, 2009 and police and interested parties were put on clear
11
C/Wealth v. Maureen Ofume Case Docket No. 0913CR004396
notice.
C.12. On telephone during these calls, I heard harsh commands suspected to be police officers. I telephoned Chief of Lynn Police Department and told my family to allow them remove our property to whereever they prefer and that I am rushing my assignment in Boston and that I will be back soon. When my family told me that the request to take our youngest bady's diaper, shoes and other personal effects were denied, I re-telephoned Chief of Lynn Police Department and men and women continued to answer me and they advised me that they will inform the Chief. My personal advise to my family was to ignore all the bully commands of the Police which I heard over the phone because I suspect that their mission is far beyond eviction but to create similar trump case which they created against my eldest son Kleber Ofume (see below).
D. FLEEING PERSECUTION FROM COUNTRY TO COUNTRY
D.1. In December 1996 my family and I fled persecution in Nigeria which was put in place by the oil/gas companies in my region (Niger Delta Region of Nigeria) because of my leadership of some of the major human rights or civil liberties and political movements and organizations inside and outside Nigeria. My interest to become the President of Nigeria ecalated the persecution. We landed in Lome, Togo (West Africa) and we were adopted as Prisoner of Consience by the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) and Amnesty International (AI - Int. Secretariat, London, UK). Each time we escape persecution, they trail our path across the border endangering our lives and means of livelihood. After we escaped assassination attempts in Lome, Togo, under the assistance of the UNHCR and Amnesty International we were granted temporary visa to Canada and we traveled to Canada on April 19, 1998.
D.2. In Canada (Nova Scotia) we suffered severe forms of physical and psychological torture and persecution including gasing our family and seizing our properties (including home, 8 Edwin Ford Court, Bedford, Nova Scotia, Canada) goods and cash. On August 8, 2003 we fled into the US and landed in Calais, ME and we were chased and hunted down and we were deported back to Canada without allowing us to appear before US immigration (Asylum) officer/Judge in breach of the UN Convention July 28, 1951 and US Immigration Law including our Due Process Rights under US Constitution. After our deportation, persecution escalated including but unlimited to seizure and holding permanent possession of our home, properties, goods and cash and rendered us homeless when the Defendant, Maureen Ofume had ONLY three (3) days to deliver baby, Christian Ofume (see Canadian medical Record on the pregnancy and delivery of child
12
C/Wealth v. Maureen Ofume Case Docket No. 0913CR004396
Christian Ofume).
I, Movant-Intervenor, Phillip Ofume certify under penalty of perjury under the United States Law that I know the content of this Affidavit signed by me and that the statements are true and correct.
Sworn & Dated: at ________________ this _________day of __________ __________
WITNESS my hand and official seal the date aforesaid.
________________ ___________________
NOTARY PUBLIC Signature of Declarant
My Commission Expires:__ ____ ____
13
copies to :
President Barack H. Obama President of the United States of America, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20500; Vice- President Joseph Biden, Washington Office: Eisenhower Executive Office Bldg. Washington, DC 20501; Honourable Eric H. Holder, Jr. US Secretary of Justice and Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Office of the Assistant Attorney General, Main Washington, D.C. 205 30; Hon. Sec. of Justice and Attorney-General of Massachusetts; Essex District Attorney Jonathan W. Blodgett ; United Nations High Commission for Human Rights United Nations High Commission for Refugees, Geneva, Switzerland.
